About
Connect with AWARE
Touchstone Consulting Group - An SRA Company
I recently attended a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Weather Service (NWS) forum in Bethesda on June 28 – the purpose of the meeting was to gather information in order to help NWS to formulate a strategy for its role in future wireless weather services. The meeting included NWS partners, across public and private sectors and was a great opportunity to learn more about NWS’ priorities and initiatives.
The slides from the event are available here: https://apps.weather.gov/partners/presentations.php
The NWS plans to experimentally produce Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) v1.2 Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) profile messages by fall 2011. See the press announcement here.
NWS has set up a new Wiki for online documentation that includes a documentation page and a collaborative discussion page for each CAP element that NWS plans to produce.
https://wiki.citizen.apps.gov/nws_developers
There was also considerable discussion of CMAS, including how the geo-targeting capability would help with the problem of ‘over-alerting’; folks in the audience also expressed concerns over the 90 character limit of CMAS messages.
As the FCC continues to pursue President Obama’s call in June, 2010 to identify an additional 500 MHz of spectrum to “unleash the wireless broadband revolution,” a new approach has cropped up in the latest budget document. In addition to the “carrot” proposed to broadcasters holding valuable spectrum with Voluntary Incentive Auctions, the new budget document released 1 February contains a “stick,” a new spectrum license fee. From the budget:
“To promote efficient use of the electromagnetic spectrum, the Administration proposes to provide the FCC with new authority to use other economic mechanisms, such as fees, as a spectrum management tool. The FCC would be authorized to set user fees on unauctioned spectrum licenses based on spectrum-management principles. Fees would be phased in over time as part of an ongoing rulemaking process to determine the appropriate application and level for fees. Fee collections are estimated to begin in 2011, and total $4.8 billion through 2021.” (2012 President’s Budget, “Other Independent Agencies” Appendix, “Federal Communications Commission” section, “Spectrum License User Fee” subsection)
By aiming these fees at “unauctioned spectrum licenses,” the government seems to be targeting the very broadcasters who are nervous about how voluntary those Voluntary Incentive Auctions will really be…
Some articles on the topic:
Yesterday’s announcement by AT&T to acquire spectrum from Qualcomm for $1.9 billion suggests yet another move towards the inevitable smartphone-ization of America. The spectrum is in the posh 700 MHz band, noted both for good propagation across long distances as well as effective penetration into buildings. It covers 300 million users across the country, including 70 million people in the tech hungry cities of New York, LA, Boston, San Francisco, and Philadelphia. Once the deal is approved, AT&T will devote this spectrum to its 4G LTE network build, in an effort to keep up with the torrid growth of seemingly infinite data demand (We’re looking at you, iPhone addicts).
A few thoughts:
1) General is better than specific: Qualcomm was using this spectrum for its FLO TV offering. Although we love the idea of watching the latest episode of The Jersey Shore or The Young and the Restless on a mobile device, does this offering really require a separate wireless data infrastructure? Was Qualcomm really planning to spend $800 million dollars building out a nationwide network to stream The Deadliest Catch to guys watching 3 inch televisions in waiting rooms? (Answer: YES.) Can’t we just watch TV with a smartphone app using the Verizon Wireless, AT&T, Sprint, or T-Mobile cellular networks? (Answer: YES.) AT&T’s 4G network on this spectrum will allow for not only the mobile consumption of internet TV, but also video chatting, internet radio, email, social networking, office applications, and whatever else the dotcom gnomes are dreaming up. Even with FLO TV’s death, will we still be able to get CSI: Miami in the palm of our hands? (Answer: YES.)
2) Growing data demand requires growing data supply requires growing $$$: Qualcomm paid $683 million in FCC auctions between 2003 and 2008 for this spectrum, which had previously been allocated for use by analog TV broadcast channel 55. They just sold it yesterday for $1.9 billion. We’ll let the Qualcomm shareholders worry about their ROI and if FLO TV was a good idea or not, but this suggests that the spectrum is much more valuable in 2010 than it was in 2008. With technology analysts like Mary Meeker predicting that mobile internet users will overtake desktop internet users in the next five years, there is no wonder that this valuable 700 MHz block appreciated like crazy in the last few years. Forget gold, the savvy bulls are chasing spectrum to cash in on the mobile revolution. When it comes to social value, 4G mobile data is worth much more than dedicated mobile TV, which was worth much more than TV broadcast channel 55.
Given where the chess pieces are moving in telephony, and how fast they are moving there, where does CMAS fit? Will Cell Broadcast based text alerts make any sense at all in 2012? Are we building a carrier-pigeon infrastructure in a telegraph world? The industry is making big bets that you’ll have a high-bandwidth, multimedia-enabled smartphone by your side all day. What a great platform to deliver a time-critical, content-rich emergency alert. Hopefully, we won’t be so engrossed watching Dancing With the Stars on our BlackBerries to get the message.
Below is a very interesting article from this week’s Washington Post Science section. The author discusses what he believes is a very real possibility: the overload of cellular networks due to much more prevalent use of SmartPhones.
What do our AWARE readers think of this? Is this a real possibility and how would it effect efforts currently underway when it comes to mobile alerts and warnings?
The first thing to go might be your smartphone’s connection to YouTube, with videos becoming increasingly choppy and then one day just failing to download. In your impatience, you decide to scout out the latest posts in the Twittersphere, except that, too, is temporarily down. Your e-mail is stalled, and even a simple text is now too arduous, as the world’s phone networks come crashing down. In the following months, it’s almost impossible to get a lasting connection, even for a voice call.
Welcome to 2013, and the first mobile meltdown.
Although this is the worst-case scenario, some kind of collapse in cellular networks in the near future is a real possibility. They are already showing signs of strain: Your phone may temporarily cut out in large crowds or at a sporting event or music gig, and if you live in New York, San Francisco or London, you may have found it increasingly difficult to make calls in your home city.
For the entire article please click here.
LANGLEY, Ark — For many visitors and residents of this heavily forested region, the appeal is in the disconnect. Without so much as a cellphone tower near these vast campgrounds, some come here happy to leave behind their ties to the urban world, preferring a soundtrack of tweeting birds over a chirping BlackBerry.
But the absence of a modern communication network made it virtually impossible last week to quickly warn campers of an approaching downpour, which led to flash floods that tore through the Albert Pike campground, killing at least 19. Now, some have begun to rethink the value of being unplugged in this remote area about 75 miles west of Little Rock.
For more on this story click here: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/14/us/14remote.html?scp=4&sq=arkansas+floods&st=nyt
